News Media Quandary Over Showing Graphic Images of Abuse
"The news media are wrestling with how many and how much of the graphic photographs they should show, and their decisions are drawing controversy of their own. Some critics have accused news organizations of serving an antiwar agenda and endangering troops and Americans overseas by showing such shocking images." ~ David Carr, The New York Times.
An interesting moment in time now as the debate is shifting from the horror of the acts to a questioning of the existance of the photographs. As if by removing the photographs from public view will make the issue of abusive treatment go away. If we can control or limit the public's ability to view them, after the barn door has been opened and the horse has escaped, this will all go away?
Another question that should be asked; does it matter, in the free-flow-of-digital-information-age, what newspapers or TV stations do with these images? Are they not already out there in the ether of the net, where the interested public has ready and un-ending access to them? Isn't under estimating the power of the digital info gathering capabilities of the general population what got this started anyway?